Organizational structure - fully projectized for success?

2001-12-29 11:34:13【作者】 畅享网 【进入论坛】
本文关键字
广告

Organizational structure - fully projectized for success?


One important decision that any organization with multiple ongoing projects needs to make is the choice of an appropriate organizational structure. These usually vary in terms of how much authority is delegated to project managers. Functional organizational structures give them very little power, while newer project-based structures give them considerable authority over projects and their resources. Depending on the type of projects involved, project-based structures can offer many advantages over more traditional models.
 

The functional organizational structure


Traditionally, people have been grouped according to the task they perform for the company

Traditionally, organizations have been structured hierarchically according to the functions performed by their employees - people are grouped according to the task they perform for the company, such as marketing or engineering. Each department - or functional unit - has its own manager and, in theory, each employee reports only to their superior in their functional unit. This structure makes it easy to centralize similar resources and provides a clear career path for employees.


The role of the project manager

A project manager in a functional organizational structure has little formal power. Problems can arise in this kind of structure when multiple projects are competing for each functional unit's resources.


Matrix structures


A matrix structured organization uses the traditional functional "vertical" structure

A matrix structured organization still uses the traditional functional "vertical" structure, but with an additional "horizontal" structure of project managers and their teams. The project manager has real control over project resources, unlike in the purely functional model. Matrix structures allow for effective sharing of functional unit resources between project teams, and effective coordination between members of different functional units. Potential problems with a matrix structure include the fact that employees may end up reporting to a number of different managers, sometimes with differing priorities.
 

Strong or weak?

Matrix structures are often described as being either "strong" or "weak". A strong matrix structure gives more power to project managers than its weak counterpart, in which functional managers play a more important role.


The fully projectized organization


The organization is structured around project teams

In a fully projectized organization, the organization is structured around project teams. Project managers have complete authority over their projects and can acquire resources for them as needed, depending on project targets. Each employee reports only to the project manager of the project to which they are assigned.

Problems that can arise with a fully projectized structure include the duplication of resources between projects, and the difficulties involved in reassigning project team members once the project has been completed.

However, this structure has a number of advantages, notably the fact that members of a project team are focused on working together toward a common goal. Effective communication between team members themselves and between team members and their project manager is also enhanced.


Should I use a fully projectized structure?


Few real-life organizations rely on either of the "extremes" of organizational structure

Few real-life organizations with multiple projects rely solely on either of the "extremes" of organizational structure - a completely functional structure in which project managers have no real authority, or a completely projectized structure. It's important for companies to weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of each structure and consider its appropriateness for their proposed projects.
Projects that are suitable for a strong matrix or projectized structure usually

  • are at least moderately large

  • have a moderate to long duration

  • use complex or new technology

  • have a high priority for the company

如果您希望与本文章的作者或其所在机构,进一步交流,请联系:畅享网 姜小姐
jill.jiang@amt.com.cn | 021-51096826-112 | 在线联系
商蓉蓉专栏[原创]营销就是“先入为主”吗..

在激烈的竞争中要努力寻找蓝海,在进入新市场时要抢占先机,以占据有利的地位。否则错失良机,蓝海很快会变成红海。

人月神话专栏[原创]精益看板管理和敏捷软件..

我们要意识到在软件开发中的浪费没有所谓的原材料,软件开发最大的浪费就是人力资源的等待已经我们开发完成工件的返工。

郭远刚谈项目管理[原创]信息系统项目成本估算的..

1. 需求信息的复杂性。与其他有些传统项目不同,信息系统要满足的诗人的主观需要。由于人的复杂性,给信息系统带来了无数的难以确定的因素。而且,随着项目的……

中国式项目管理[原创]软件产品的生命周期

管理软件,无论规划多好,一般生存10年就不错了,随着客户个性化需求不断累积,原来的架构难以适应鲜活的业务需求。

段柯专栏[原创]诊断中小企业软件项目管..

对于企业管理,大公司有大公司的方式,小公司有小公司的方式,如果把别人的经验生搬硬套到自己身上,可能会适得其反。